Imagine a compliance platform that costs $12,000 per year. Is it expensive?

It all depends on the item you are replacing.

If you invest $12,000 to eliminate hundreds of hours in repetitive evidence gathering across the complex technological world this could be money wisely invested. If a company of seven could have the same proof manually in a few minutes every month, the cost will be very different.

It’s an effective method to begin your search for Vanta. Don’t begin by asking what platform comes with the greatest features. Ask your company how these features will save you time and money.

Automation Has an Economic Break-Even Factor

Automation of compliance isn’t intrinsically beneficial or harmful. Scale changes its value. Imagine a technology company that is growing that has hundreds of employees numerous cloud environments, a variety of applications, and regular access changes. The manual process of gathering evidence can be a major operational burden. Integrations which automatically monitor systems and gather evidence are able to justify the cost.

Imagine a startup of 10 people getting ready to go through the initial SOC 2. audit. It could have a small infrastructure, and evidence collection could be managed without extensive automation.

This difference is important when evaluating Vanta’s pricing. While an advanced platform could offer many capabilities however, they’re only useful when the organization is in need of them.

Compare Architecture and Not Just Brands

A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. Both platforms are built on automation and integration with each other, which means that companies looking for this approach can benefit from comparing the frameworks supported by their integrations, as well as the service as well as individual quotes and contracts.

There’s yet another one that you must make. Do you have a company that is interested in an integrated platform that can help you achieve compliance? Some businesses want automated evidence collection as well as continuous monitoring. Certain businesses prefer collecting evidence on their own.

Vanta Competitors Do not All Use the Same Model

Several well-known Vanta competitors have a place in the market, with a similar focus on automation. There are lighter platforms which focus on organization and large system connectivity.

CertAssist is a part of the latter category. The product was created by compliance consultants as well as internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a single workstation, allows for the editing of policies and evidence guidance, and lets auditors review submitted evidence by gaining read-only access.

It doesn’t install agents or connect to infrastructure systems. Customers upload their own proof.

Factor System Access into the Decision

It is clear that cutting off integrations is a disadvantage. Someone has to gather evidence by hand.

This also means that integration setup is eliminated and means the compliance application does not require constant connections to the company’s operational environment.

Both are equally effective. It is essential to inquire what tradeoffs are appropriate to your business.

CertAssist is targeted at groups of roughly five to 200 members and announces its prices, rather than requiring an initial sales call to determine the initial figure. The price for the initial launch is $225 a month, which is comparable to the usual price of $375 a month.

Let Complexity Take Its Place

Needs for startups today with a staff of 10 are not necessarily the same as those of an organization with 100 or 500 employees.

While compliance is simple but a lighter platform might be a good idea. As the number of systems, employees, frameworks and evidence requirements increase, the economy could eventually favor greater automation. Let complexity play a role when it comes to purchasing compliance technology.

Do not pay for 50 integrations merely because they appear attractive on a comparison chart. Pay for them if manually performing the work they replace becomes the more expensive option.