Let’s say a compliance platform costs $12,000 per year. Is that expensive?
It all depends on the item you’re replacing.
If automating the collection of evidence in a complicated technology environment eliminates hundreds hours of repetitive work then $12,000 could be a wise investment. The math would be different if a startup of seven individuals could gather the same amount of evidence in just a few minutes each month.
This is a great way to locate Vanta alternatives. Start by asking which platform offers the greatest features. Ask your company how these features can help you save time and money.
The Break-Even Level for Automation
Automating compliance isn’t inherently beneficial or harmful. The benefit of compliance automation is dependent on the size of the business. Imagine a company that is growing that has multiple cloud environments and many applications. Continuously gathering evidence manually could cause a significant operational burden. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and collect evidence can easily justify their expense.
Consider a startup with 10 employees getting ready for its first SOC 2. Consider a startup with 10 employees preparing for its first SOC 2.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. Although an advanced platform might have many features However, they’re only beneficial only when an organization is required by the company.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
Searching for Vanta and Drata will quickly turn into an exercise in feature-by-feature. Both platforms are based on automation and integration with each other, which means that companies looking for this approach can benefit from comparison of the frameworks that are supported, their integrations and service as well as individual quotations and contracts.
There’s another choice to make prior to that. Are you interested in an integration-driven system for compliance? Some companies prefer continuous monitoring, automated evidence collection, and automated evidence gathering. Others prefer to provide evidence on their own, particularly in cases of low workload.
Vanta Competitors Do not All Use the same model
A lot of Vanta competitors are in the same space that focuses on automation. There are also lighter platforms that focus on organization over large system connectivity.
CertAssist is part of this group. It was developed by compliance consultants and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a central work area, gives editable policies and evidence guidelines, and allows auditors to examine evidence submitted with read-only access.
It does not set up agents or connect to the infrastructure system. Customers can upload evidence that they’ve chosen.
It is important to consider the system’s access.
The detachment of integrations is not without its downsides. Someone has to take the time to collect evidence.
This also means that integration setup is eliminated and this means that the compliance application doesn’t require standing connections to the company’s operational environment.
Both of these architectures are equally great. The relevant question is which tradeoff makes sense to your business.
CertAssist is geared towards teams of roughly five to 200 individuals. It also publishes its pricing rather than requiring the salesperson to discuss the starting figure. The stated launch price for CertAssist is $225 a month, as opposed to the standard $375.
Let Complexity take its rightful Place
What a startup with 10 employees requires today may not be the same at 500 or 100 employees.
It is possible to maintain compliance with a a simple platform. The costs of automation will increase as systems, employees and frameworks grow. That’s a healthier way to invest in compliance technology to let complexity earn its rightful place.
Do not pay for fifty different integrations because they seem impressive on the comparison chart. Spend money on them when manually doing the tasks they replace becomes the more expensive option.